The Write Palette
  • WriteTime Memories
  • Blog: Camera in Hand
  • Photo Story Project Form
  • WriteTime Memories
  • Blog: Camera in Hand
  • Photo Story Project Form
Search by typing & pressing enter

YOUR CART

10/31/2013 0 Comments

Plan Design Changes Boost Savings

Behavioral research has suggested that default levels do matter. Just yesterday, I was in the supermarket. Yogurt was 10 for $10, so what did I do? I bought 10, of course. The interesting thing is that it still would have registered as $1 each if I bought a smaller quantity. Cucumbers were 3 for $2, so I naturally bought 3, even though the price would still have been 66 2/3 cents each had I bought a quantity that wasn't a multiple of 3. Limes were 10 for $2, so I bought 10, right? Not this time - but I did buy a multiple of 5 - that is, 5 for $1.

What does this have to do with 401(k) plans? More than you might think. For the longest time, the most popular employer match was 50 cents on the dollar up to the first 6% of employee deferrals. Now, according to Aon Hewitt's "2013 Trends & Experience in Defined Contribution Plans: An Evolving Retirement Landscape," the most popular match is a full dollar on the dollar. According to Aon Hewitt, three-fourths of employees save at or above the company match level, so if that holds, savings would rise substantially.  

Other noteworthy trends reported by Aon Hewitt include:
  • 76% of plans allow immediate pre-tax contributions upon hire, versus 45% in 2001.
  • While 59% of plans have automatic enrollment, more than half have set the default savings rate below the employer match level. While this tends to increase participation, it also will tend to lower savings levels.
  • Employers offering managed accounts ballooned from 29% in 2011 to 52% in 2013.
  • Target-date funds are now the norm, with 86% of plans offering them.
  • Employers permitting Roth contributions jumped from 11% to 50% in 6 years.

For the most part, it appears that employees appreciate the help they get through automated programs and other tools designed to make their decision-making easier. . Few ever decide to opt out. The higher employer match should greatly benefit those who stay with their plan and contribute at the higher employer match level. For those who contribute at lower levels, it would be helpful to determine the obstacles - for example, are other financial challenges standing in the way? If so, is there a way to get these participants to both save more and more effectively address the other financial factors?
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Blog Author - Ken Felsher

    With over 25 years of writing, editing, and research experience. I enjoy sharing with my readers my love of working with content on a variety of subjects.

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All 401(k) 402(g) Boomers Catch-up DB Dc Deferral Limit Defined Benefit Defined Contribution ERISA Healthcare Participation Pension Professionally Managed RCS Retirement Retirement Confidence Tax Code Vanguard Women Working

    Archives

    March 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012

© The Write Palette, 2020